Skip to main content

Ebola in Texas

A man sickened with Ebola in Texas has already made international news and the implications of case have multiple implications not only in healthcare, but in society and politics as well.

The first and most important thing is that Texas grossly underfunds public health in the state.  Under funding public health care means that citizens are at higher risk for falling victim to an epidemic disease like Ebola because there are insufficient resources (including training for the emergency room hospital workers to be able to recognize the disease's symptoms) to respond to the epidemic early and contain it.

Texas Republicans have cut back public health funding, undoubtedly because they see it as big government, to the point where the state with one of the fastest growing populations in the country ranks 34th nationally, according to a 2013 report by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. This is not new news. Texas gubernatorial candidate Wendy Davis gets the gift of a new talking point in an already tight election race.

When it comes to public health, government is the appropriate institution to respond to these kinds of crises. What most people don't know is that public health response to disease came from the business sector in the 1600s as global trade began to expand.  A ship that arrived into a port carrying diseases could quickly devastate a major trading center and hurt a country economically.  Business demanded better regulations around screening ships to protect their profits.

The sadder implications of the case in Texas is the likely social response.  Undoubtedly due to an already hostile culture toward outsiders in the state, we will likely see increased attacks on individuals perceived to carry the disease --most likely immigrant Africans since the man came from Liberia.  We don't actually know if he is Liberian, and that's important to remember.  He could easily be an aid worker or other professional based in Liberia who was home visiting family members.

Nationally I suspect we will start to see travel moratoriums put in place for countries where the disease has been detected.  This has big economic implications for these countries, many of which already struggle economically.  Their health systems were already made vulnerable enough by economic policies advocated by conservative political groups which advocate underfunding of healthcare systems in favor of private sector responses.  In a case like Ebola, you can't wait to have a bidding war among private healthcare providers to respond to an epidemic. Health systems around the world need to be appropriately funded so that workers have the resources, protection, and support they need to respond quickly and effectively to public health crises like Ebola. Without it, we are all at risk.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

There Are Other Masters Degrees Besides a Nurse Practitioner - Part I

It strikes me that many students and nurses do not seem to know about the "other" masters degree options for nurses.  Everyone seems to want to be a nurse practitioner these days.  Now, that's great news for the primary care provider shortage, but we need nurses with masters degrees who can work in other positions and have other skill sets. Let's review the other masters degrees in nursing.  Nearest and dearest to my own heart is Nursing Education.  Remember that really cool clinical instructor you had in your entry-level nursing program --that could be you!  Do you like precepting new hires?  Are you the person on your unit who unofficially keeps everyone up-to-date on the latest evidence?  Do you really enjoy patient teaching, whether in the hospital or community setting?  Do you just like to teach?  Nursing education is the right masters for you.  Skills learned in a nursing education masters cannot be learned on the job.  Cur...

Is it time to get your PhD in Nursing or Midwifery?

 Over the years, I've written a lot about pursuing a PhD in nursing and I'm including midwives because we need more PhD prepared midwives too.  Getting a PhD is a great way to address the problems you've seen on the frontlines of COVID-19, another way to address the social injustices of racism and discrimination on health outcomes, and to make your voice heard by the decision-makers. A third of the 1% of nurses with PhDs will retire in the next five years so we need people to take their place. We cannot lose our voices in all the places where nurses and midwives with PhDs work. Here's a compilation of the posts I've written about getting a PhD and the things to think about as you figure out where you want to apply. PhD or DNP?   This is where many people start when trying to decide on their doctoral-level career advancement. This post has my two cents on the topic. Should you work as a nurse before getting a PhD?   There's a lot of opinions out there on this sub...

Codes

Remember your first code?  That time when you see that first patient under your care go into respiratory or cardiac arrest?  Haven't had one yet?  It will come, soon enough. Responding to a code takes some training.  Simulation has gone a long way in helping new healthcare providers respond better to that first emergency.  It doesn't mean that first time doesn't make you freeze up; make you cold with fear that whatever you do will not be enough; of having to talk to the family, comfort them if things do not go well. Any emergency response requires training.  Anyone who thinks that in the face of danger, they will respond heroically and with a clear head has never actually been in that kind of situation.  Ask any soldier who has gone through battle and many will tell you the first time in the face of real danger did not necessarily go as they had been told in training.  They did not necessarily respond as they thought they would, as they would ...

Translate