Skip to main content

Ebola in Texas

A man sickened with Ebola in Texas has already made international news and the implications of case have multiple implications not only in healthcare, but in society and politics as well.

The first and most important thing is that Texas grossly underfunds public health in the state.  Under funding public health care means that citizens are at higher risk for falling victim to an epidemic disease like Ebola because there are insufficient resources (including training for the emergency room hospital workers to be able to recognize the disease's symptoms) to respond to the epidemic early and contain it.

Texas Republicans have cut back public health funding, undoubtedly because they see it as big government, to the point where the state with one of the fastest growing populations in the country ranks 34th nationally, according to a 2013 report by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. This is not new news. Texas gubernatorial candidate Wendy Davis gets the gift of a new talking point in an already tight election race.

When it comes to public health, government is the appropriate institution to respond to these kinds of crises. What most people don't know is that public health response to disease came from the business sector in the 1600s as global trade began to expand.  A ship that arrived into a port carrying diseases could quickly devastate a major trading center and hurt a country economically.  Business demanded better regulations around screening ships to protect their profits.

The sadder implications of the case in Texas is the likely social response.  Undoubtedly due to an already hostile culture toward outsiders in the state, we will likely see increased attacks on individuals perceived to carry the disease --most likely immigrant Africans since the man came from Liberia.  We don't actually know if he is Liberian, and that's important to remember.  He could easily be an aid worker or other professional based in Liberia who was home visiting family members.

Nationally I suspect we will start to see travel moratoriums put in place for countries where the disease has been detected.  This has big economic implications for these countries, many of which already struggle economically.  Their health systems were already made vulnerable enough by economic policies advocated by conservative political groups which advocate underfunding of healthcare systems in favor of private sector responses.  In a case like Ebola, you can't wait to have a bidding war among private healthcare providers to respond to an epidemic. Health systems around the world need to be appropriately funded so that workers have the resources, protection, and support they need to respond quickly and effectively to public health crises like Ebola. Without it, we are all at risk.


Popular posts from this blog

There Are Other Masters Degrees Besides a Nurse Practitioner - Part I

It strikes me that many students and nurses do not seem to know about the "other" masters degree options for nurses.  Everyone seems to want to be a nurse practitioner these days.  Now, that's great news for the primary care provider shortage, but we need nurses with masters degrees who can work in other positions and have other skill sets.
Let's review the other masters degrees in nursing.  Nearest and dearest to my own heart is Nursing Education.  Remember that really cool clinical instructor you had in your entry-level nursing program --that could be you!  Do you like precepting new hires?  Are you the person on your unit who unofficially keeps everyone up-to-date on the latest evidence?  Do you really enjoy patient teaching, whether in the hospital or community setting?  Do you just like to teach?  Nursing education is the right masters for you.  Skills learned in a nursing education masters cannot be learned on the job.  Curriculum writing and program developmen…

The 32 Hour Work Week for Nurses

Sometimes it's nice to see research that confirms a hunch you've had for a few years.  A recent study in Health Affairs, one of the most influential health policy journals in the United States, looked at the effects of 12 hour shifts on patient satisfaction and nurse burnout rates.

Turns out, results are not good.  The longer nurses worked in a day, the less satisfied patients were with the quality of care.  In addition, nurses working 12 hour shifts were more likely to become burnt out than those working fewer hours.

On the overtime policy front, that's good news for nurses.  The study adds just one more reason why mandatory overtime is bad policy.  It should create incentive for staffing units appropriately and closer to the California standards.

From another perspective, we know why nurses like 12 hour shifts.  Let's face it, 3 days a week of work and then a bunch of days off in a row, so many sometimes that you don't have to use vacation days if you can set y…

Here's a Great Study Highlighting the Impact of Racism on Nurses

“I Can Never Be Too Comfortable”: Race, Gender, and Emotion at the Hospital Bedside
That's the title of a new study that just came out in Qualitative Health Research. The study of bedside nurses' diaries of their experiences reveals how nurses experience racism on the job. It comes not just from patients, but also from peers and management.
We have to talk about this more folks. It's time we deal with it better, in every setting.