Skip to main content

Codes

Remember your first code?  That time when you see that first patient under your care go into respiratory or cardiac arrest?  Haven't had one yet?  It will come, soon enough.

Responding to a code takes some training.  Simulation has gone a long way in helping new healthcare providers respond better to that first emergency.  It doesn't mean that first time doesn't make you freeze up; make you cold with fear that whatever you do will not be enough; of having to talk to the family, comfort them if things do not go well.

Any emergency response requires training.  Anyone who thinks that in the face of danger, they will respond heroically and with a clear head has never actually been in that kind of situation.  Ask any soldier who has gone through battle and many will tell you the first time in the face of real danger did not necessarily go as they had been told in training.  They did not necessarily respond as they thought they would, as they would have wished.

It is the fallacy of an emergency response; of any response to danger confronting us; of the fact that we cannot know how good our emergency or disaster response plan is until it has to be executed.  Our egos assume that we will respond to thwart the danger.  In reality, many of us freeze up, act in ways we did not expect.  Sometimes with bravery, sometimes with paralysis.

The NRA's main argument is that if everyone owns guns, things like what happened in Newtown, CT will not happen anymore.  It makes a huge assumption that gun ownership will provide you with a clear head in an emergency, like a school shooting or the highly unlikely incident that someone breaks into a home while someone is at home.

A healthcare provider responding to a code in a hospital has a lot of "guns" at their disposal to deal with the "intruders" causing the danger.  They have training on how to handle the situation.  At the same time, the first time for anyone does not mean that they will respond effectively to deal with the intruder.  It requires a team to respond.  But armed response teams in every school and public place in America are a costly and stupid response.

Ask anyone in their first crisis situation, the case it would be for most people facing an armed intruder in a home, a school, or other location: That first time you have to respond you never act how you might think. That is the major fallacy behind most gun arguments in the US.  It assumes that people will actually respond the way they think, that guns will make them braver and keep their heads clear in an awful, unexpected situation.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

There Are Other Masters Degrees Besides a Nurse Practitioner - Part I

It strikes me that many students and nurses do not seem to know about the "other" masters degree options for nurses.  Everyone seems to want to be a nurse practitioner these days.  Now, that's great news for the primary care provider shortage, but we need nurses with masters degrees who can work in other positions and have other skill sets.
Let's review the other masters degrees in nursing.  Nearest and dearest to my own heart is Nursing Education.  Remember that really cool clinical instructor you had in your entry-level nursing program --that could be you!  Do you like precepting new hires?  Are you the person on your unit who unofficially keeps everyone up-to-date on the latest evidence?  Do you really enjoy patient teaching, whether in the hospital or community setting?  Do you just like to teach?  Nursing education is the right masters for you.  Skills learned in a nursing education masters cannot be learned on the job.  Curriculum writing and program developmen…

Here's a Great Study Highlighting the Impact of Racism on Nurses

“I Can Never Be Too Comfortable”: Race, Gender, and Emotion at the Hospital Bedside
That's the title of a new study that just came out in Qualitative Health Research. The study of bedside nurses' diaries of their experiences reveals how nurses experience racism on the job. It comes not just from patients, but also from peers and management.
We have to talk about this more folks. It's time we deal with it better, in every setting.

The 32 Hour Work Week for Nurses

Sometimes it's nice to see research that confirms a hunch you've had for a few years.  A recent study in Health Affairs, one of the most influential health policy journals in the United States, looked at the effects of 12 hour shifts on patient satisfaction and nurse burnout rates.

Turns out, results are not good.  The longer nurses worked in a day, the less satisfied patients were with the quality of care.  In addition, nurses working 12 hour shifts were more likely to become burnt out than those working fewer hours.

On the overtime policy front, that's good news for nurses.  The study adds just one more reason why mandatory overtime is bad policy.  It should create incentive for staffing units appropriately and closer to the California standards.

From another perspective, we know why nurses like 12 hour shifts.  Let's face it, 3 days a week of work and then a bunch of days off in a row, so many sometimes that you don't have to use vacation days if you can set y…

Translate