Skip to main content

Unhelpful Legislation

"Unhelpful" is about as nice as I can phrase it.  In the US state of Georgia, a state dominated by Republicans who extol the virtues of small government and less regulation, the party voted in legislation that has made the licensure renewal process for healthcare professionals extra burdensome and requiring additional paperwork.  Of course, since government spending also had to be cut, they reduced the staff that processes licenses.

What's going on?  Georgia now requires healthcare professionals to submit proof of legal residence, legal work permit, or citizenship to get their license renewed.  That is ALL healthcare professionals, even those born in the US.  The initiative is supposed to "weed out" anyone who might not actually be qualified to practice and got a "false" license.

NPR reports on the consequences to healthcare professionals, especially those who received their education outside the US or who were international students when they completed their healthcare degree and are LEGALLY working under various types of visas or other forms of legal work.  The measure has forced 600 nurses and 1,300 physicians out of work because they cannot work in their healthcare facility without and up-to-date license.

There are two major consequences of this xenophobic piece of legislation.  The first is economic.  Assuming the 1,300 physicians make somewhere around the national average of $175,000 per year and the nurses around the US national average of $66,000, those earnings losses have a significant effect on the economy in terms of consumer spending.  The second is to patients.  The legislation is taking away providers from direct patient care situations and increasing the risk for complications.  It is also decreasing everyone's ability to access the healthcare system.  Depending on how long these providers are out of work, the measure could actually cost the healthcare systems in Georgia a whole lot more money in the long run.

The legislation also reveals the gross ignorance of the policymakers involved in passing it.  Internationally educated physicians need to pass a credentials review by the Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates.  Then they have to pass the US Medical Licensure Exam --all THREE parts of it--before they apply for residency programs.  Guess what else?  The exam is expensive and can cost the foreign medical graduate almost $15,000.  Furthermore, the residency programs often repeat the training they received in their home country.  Chance of someone faking credentials?  Slim to none.

Nurses have to undergo a rigorous credentials evaluation through the Commission on Graduates of Foreign Nursing Schools (CGFNS).  The same organization also credentials internationally educated physical and occupational therapists.  Nurses, once they have their credentials evaluated, then have to pass the US nursing licensure exam known as the NCLEX.  If they pass both those hoops, then they need to obtain a legal work visa which usually requires employer sponsorship.  If you have a work visa, you can legally be in the country.  Employers have to pay them too, so they need to get a social security number for tax purposes.  Chance of someone faking credentials or working illegally?  Slim to none.

With a looming nursing and primary care physician shortage, the last thing the healthcare system needs are roadblocks to renewing professional licenses of hardworking healthcare professionals who make a difference every day.  In places where internationally educated healthcare providers help communities address their health needs, and when they speak the same language as the patient, they help reduce system costs by reducing health disparities in minority populations.

Legislation like that which passed in Georgia doesn't weed out illegal immigrants.  It just makes both the public and private sectors of the healthcare system harder to operate.  In the end, it will cost the state more  than just money.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is it time to get your PhD in Nursing or Midwifery?

 Over the years, I've written a lot about pursuing a PhD in nursing and I'm including midwives because we need more PhD prepared midwives too.  Getting a PhD is a great way to address the problems you've seen on the frontlines of COVID-19, another way to address the social injustices of racism and discrimination on health outcomes, and to make your voice heard by the decision-makers. A third of the 1% of nurses with PhDs will retire in the next five years so we need people to take their place. We cannot lose our voices in all the places where nurses and midwives with PhDs work. Here's a compilation of the posts I've written about getting a PhD and the things to think about as you figure out where you want to apply. PhD or DNP?   This is where many people start when trying to decide on their doctoral-level career advancement. This post has my two cents on the topic. Should you work as a nurse before getting a PhD?   There's a lot of opinions out there on this sub...

The 32 Hour Work Week for Nurses

Sometimes it's nice to see research that confirms a hunch you've had for a few years.  A recent study in Health Affairs , one of the most influential health policy journals in the United States, looked at the effects of 12 hour shifts on patient satisfaction and nurse burnout rates. Turns out, results are not good.  The longer nurses worked in a day, the less satisfied patients were with the quality of care.  In addition, nurses working 12 hour shifts were more likely to become burnt out than those working fewer hours. On the overtime policy front, that's good news for nurses.  The study adds just one more reason why mandatory overtime is bad policy.  It should create incentive for staffing units appropriately and closer to the California standards. From another perspective, we know why nurses like 12 hour shifts.  Let's face it, 3 days a week of work and then a bunch of days off in a row, so many sometimes that you don't have to use vacation day...

US Nurses: Vote Today!

Nurses: There is no excuse not to vote .   There is too much at stake this year that affects the health of our patients. Be a smart voter and choose five major issues that affect your job and your patients' ability to get care and services.  Take those five issues and make sure you study how candidates at all levels, from local representation through the president, match up with your perspectives. Voting because of a single issue or stance by a candidate is not good critical thinking.  The world is too complex for your vote to come down to one single thing. Finally, if you experience any voting issues, or are the subject of intimidation from other voters, poll watchers, or election site workers, please call 1-866-OUR -VOTE for legal assistance at no charge.

Translate